Worrisome Met Police Ad Campaign
Sunday, March 16th, 2008
This new police “anti-terrorism” ad campaign seems both useless in finding real terrorist threats, and worrying for real photographers. According to their stance, I would “seem odd” (and no doubt reported) for taking this shot of a CCTV camera. I didn’t take any notes, but I easily could have been noting the place of the shot, what settings I used etc. I’ve actually been annoyed with myself for not noting the location since folks have often asked.
The truth is that non-photographers often don’t “get” why we take certain shots. On more than one occasion I’ve been asked “What are you taking a photo of?” when it was something a-typical. So, what is “odd”? When I am out with other photographers they always notice things I don’t, and it’s often a lot more interesting than what I have seen, and I can appreciate what they find. Do non-photographers see the artistic potential is what we are shooting or are we simply doing something “odd”? As this fear-mongering is compounded by other ridiculous campaigns such as reporting people with multiple cell phones, where do we draw the line?
Read more about the police ad campaign and Thomas Hawk posted about this with a number of comments which are worth reading.
What are your thoughts?
Update: You may want to check out this video: You Can’t Picture This (Thanks Ben for the link). Worth the watch.
Btw, for more on UK Photographer Rights check out the The UK Photographers Rights Guide by Linda Macpherson and provided by Simon Moran. You can download a PDF from the site.














